Cixi's Influence: Political Power and the Early Seeds of Women's Emancipation in Imperial China

Introduction

Empress Dowager Cixi from the late Qing Dynasty was one of the leading stateswomen in China’s history and is remembered for her political maneuvering, administrative changes, and a rather ambiguous attitude toward the modernization of China (Chan, 2015). This paper aims to paint the picture of Cixi’s complex reign by analyzing her political prowess, her contribution to China’s transformation, her position in the advancement of women, and the strengths and weaknesses of her regime. Through examining the many facets of Cixi’s rule, this analysis seeks to present a more comprehensive picture of her legacy in China during a time of enormous transition and to illuminate the issues that women leaders encounter in maneuvering through the waters of political and social transformation in a society that is highly patrifocal.

Background

In the late Qing Dynasty China experienced many problems such as the aggression of foreign powers, internal revolts and decline in the authority of the monarchy. At this time of political volatility and uncertainty, Empress Dowager Cixi rise to power and influence can be seen as a woman asserting her authority and power in the male-dominated court (Peng, 2014). Cixi was born into a humble Manchu family whose status within the imperial hierarchy was rather low; however, she became one of Emperor Xianfeng’s concubines which opened the door to her political career (Karl, 2002). After Xianfeng’s death in 1861, Cixi was able to strategically align herself and eliminate those who threatened her power; she became the regent for her young son and successor, Emperor Tongzhi (Hucker, 1975). With the help of her political skills, scheming, and determination, Cixi gradually seized more power and became the de facto ruler of China for almost half a century thus laying the foundation for her tremendous influence on the political development of China (Biedzynski, 2015).

Cixi’s Political Maneuvers and Influence

Cixi’s style of leadership was one that was somewhat progressive and at the same time, conservative, which was quite in tune with the dynamics of a China that was struggling to fit into a new world order (Zhang, 2010). Her support of the Self-Strengthening Movement early on showed awareness of the necessity of acquiring Western technology and culture in order to increase China’s strength. Nonetheless, the scope of these reforms was rather limited, and their implementation was rather inconsistent, pointing to the challenges of transforming the conservative mindset of the imperial court and the bureaucracy.

Cixi’s reforms in the administration of China and its military were quite impressive in their efforts to transform the Chinese bureaucracy and military into a modern force; however, the reforms were limited by the power struggle between different factions within the imperial court (Barish, 2019). Thus, the creation of the Zongli Yamen was an important step on the way to the interaction with the external environment, however, it did not solve the problem of the imbalance in China’s foreign relations. Furthermore, Cixi’s attempts to advance women’s education which was quite revolutionary in the context of the Confucian society, were rather restrained and did not seek to radically change the gender norms of the given society.

Thus, Cixi’s management of foreign affairs was characterized by a number of tactical errors and lost opportunities. Her early receptiveness to the foreign contact and her support to the Tongzhi Restoration (Horowitz, 2003) showed her more pragmatic side in improving China’s status. Nevertheless, the increasing anti-foreign sentiment and the Boxer Rebellion revealed the weaknesses in Cixi’s approach to foreign affairs. Her decision to support the Boxers and declare war against the foreigners in 1900 Wei (2011) was a big mistake that led to a disastrous defeat of China, loss of sovereignty and signing of the Boxer Protocol that worsened the economic status of the country.

The effects of Cixi’s political strategy and administrative changes in the long run were rather ambiguous. Although she set the foundation for changes that would occur in the future, the conservative response to the Hundred Days’ Reform and the poor handling of foreign affairs led to the downfall of the dynasty. The subsequent historical analyses of Cixi’s reign are divided into two main opinions: on one side, scholars state that her actions were a result of the overall political and social conditions of the time, and on the other, her critics claim that Cixi was more interested in her own agendas and was not ready to change China for the better. Empress Dowager Cixi’s political strategies and organizational changes influenced the process of China’s evolution during the time of transition to a great extent. Nevertheless, her early initiatives to transform the country reveal that she was aware of the difficulties of the Chinese state; however, her later conservative approaches and tactical mistakes led to the failure of a more extensive transformation.

Early Seeds of Women’s Emancipation

The position of Empress Dowager Cixi as a powerful woman during the late Qing Dynasty in China provided a strong reference for position of women and the beginnings of women’s emancipation. In the context of the highly patriarchal society of China, Cixi became a powerful woman who went against the grain and paved the way for women in politics in the country (Barish, 2019). Her advocacy for educational measures, especially the foundation of schools for noble women revealed that she understood the significance of woman’s education and their role in the society. In this context, these actions can be considered as the preparation for future improvements in women’s rights and gender equality in China.

Comparing Cixi with her peer, Queen Victoria of United Kingdom, it is possible to observe that they have much in common in their attitudes towards women and women’s liberation though there were some distinctions as well. Both women were powerful in their respective societies that were dominated by men; however, they played different roles in the fight for women’s rights (Yaacob et al. , 2023). Queen Victoria symbolised the authority of women but her own perception of women’s place was rather traditional and she did not crusade for women’s enfranchisement or equal rights (Yaacob et al. , 2023). On the other hand Cixi’s active support to women education and her provision of special facilities for women was a more lenient way of enhancing the status of women in the society although she was quite conservative in many aspects.

The impact of Cixi’s actions of women emancipation in China can be regarded as rather dual and multifaceted. On the one hand, as a woman and a queen she supported women’s education and this influenced people’s perception of women. These actions led to the future advancement of the gender equality and women’s rights in China. But the more general conservative approach in her later years as well as the political instability of the period limited the possibilities and the speed of these changes. However, one should note that Cixi’s approach to women’s liberation was rather different from other female rulers of her time, including Queen Victoria, who ruled but did not work for the emancipation of women.

Comparing Empress Dowager Cixi and Queen Victoria, the aspects of women’s position and women’s liberation in details disclose the characteristics of Cixi’s regime in this respect. However, Cixi can be viewed as a more progressive figure and the supporter of women’s rights and their education even earlier than many of her peers among Chinese activists. Nevertheless, thanks to the efforts of Cixi that, however, was limited by her rather conservative approach and the tendencies of the period, it became possible to speak about further development of the women’s issue and their liberation in China.

Criticisms and Limitations

The rule of Empress Dowager Cixi has been the topic of much analysis, and the historians and scholars continue to discuss her leadership, the approach to the modernization, and the role of China in the late period of the Qing Dynasty. This view holds that Cixi’s autocratic rule and her vacillation on the issue of reform put paid to China’s chances of making the great leap forward when it was most needed. Such critics often depict Cixi as a tyrant who did not rule for the benefit of China and the Chinese people but only for her own benefit. This negative depiction is made worse by the gender stereotyping that was rife at the time, which portrayed powerful women in a rather bad light (Yaacob, Razali, & Febriansyah, 2023).

Perhaps the most often mentioned of the counter-reforming policies of Cixi is her role in halting the Hundred Days’ Reform of 1898. These reforms were started by the Emperor Guangxu where the intention was to transform China into a new political and social structure with many changes in the institutions. But Cixi stopped the these changes suddenly and vehemently which showed her conservative approach and also her apprehension to control the power. As is the case with many historical events, this process is perceived by many historians as a missed opportunity that hindered the possibility of early modernization of China and led to the gradual weakening of the Qing dynasty (Zhang, 2010).

Also, Cixi’s actions during the Boxer Rebellion have made her look like a backward looking leader. This paper concludes that her support for the boxers, a group of people who were very violent towards foreign and Christians resulted in China’s downfall such as a shameful defeat to the foreign powers and a poor peace agreement. This episode revealed Cixi’s prejudice against the foreigners and her ineptness in managing the affairs of China in the international scene, which only worsened the state of China (Yue, 2003).

Thus, analyzing Cixi’s impact on women’s liberation, one can state that she contributed to the process but her main goals were political. Others have claimed that her support for women’s education was tokenistic based on the fact that she founded the School for Female Nobles. Thus, the school helped advance Cixi’s power and position more than it aimed to empower women (Barish, 2019). However, the culture of Qing Dynasty and the conservative and patriarchal mindset of the society also posed certain constraints to the advances made by Cixi in the women’s rights. Her personal authority and authority had the potential to change the existing gender power relations and to kick start the process of women’s emancipation, but she failed to do so (Yua, 2015).

When comparing Cixi with other historical female rulers, for example, Queen Victoria of United Kingdom or Empress Dowager Shōken of Japan, one is able to see that her impact was limited in bringing about change. While Queen Victoria was the ruler during the time of industrial revolution as well as cultural and political changes, and Empress Shoken contributed to the social and educational reforms, Cixi is considered to have implemented more of the conservative and self-interested policies (Jacobsen, 2013).

Conclusion

Thus, it can be stated that Empress Dowager Cixi’s reign was marked by the intricate interdependence of personal power struggle, political conservativeness and the dynamics of the modern world. Her early attempts at instituting reforms and navigating the country’s foreign relations depicted a leader who comprehended the various issues facing the empire, though her later period characterized by conservative policies and poor strategy was retrogressive and played a part in the downfall of the Qing dynasty. It is vital not to disregard the fact that Cixi played the role of planting the seeds of women’s emancipation even if her reign had certain restrictions. She was a bold woman who took a leadership position in a society that was quite rigid and dismissed women’s authority, and she offered the first female political leadership. However, Cixi’s political influence was restrained by the conservative forces and political instability of the time; however, it is impossible not to acknowledge that she left a lasting mark on women’s rights and gender equality in the history of China, painting a more detailed and ambiguous picture of a woman’s power in the process of transformation.

References

Barish, D. (2019). Empress Dowager Cixi’s imperial pedagogy: The school for female nobles and new visions of authority in early twentieth century China. Nan Nü.

Biedzynski, J. (2015). Empress Dowager Cixi The Concubine Who Launched Modern China by Jung Chang. Journal of Third World Studies, 32(1), 318-319.

Chan, Y. K. (2015). A Precious Mirror for Governing the Peace: A Primer for Empress Dowager Cixi. Nan Nü, 17(2), 214-244.

Horowitz, R. (2003). Breaking the bonds of precedent: The 1905–6 government reform commission and the remaking of the Qing central state. Modern Asian Studies, 37, 775-797.

Hucker, C. O. (1975). China's imperial past: An introduction to Chinese history and culture. Stanford University Press.

Jacobsen, S. G. (2013). Limits to despotism: Idealizations of Chinese governance and legitimizations of absolutist Europe. Journal of Early Modern History, 17, 347-389.

Karl, R. E. (2002). Staging the world: Chinese nationalism at the turn of the twentieth century. Duke University Press.

Peng, Y. C. (2014). Staging Sovereignty: Empress Dowager Cixi (1835-1908) and Late Qing Court Art Production. University of California, Los Angeles.

Wei, G. (2011). On the reason of Yuan Shi-kai's betray——reason of Wuxu reform failure. Journal of Daqing Normal University.

Yaacob, M. D. I., Razali, S. Z., & Febriansyah, M. (2023). Gender issues and the distorted narrative in women leadership in China: The case of Empress Dowager Cixi (1861-1908). Intellectual Discourse.

Yua, Z. (2015). Feminism implied in the image of Cixi-On modern significance of Imperial Woman: The Story of the Last Empress of China. Journal of Suzhou University.

Yue, O. (2003). The psychological state of the Empress Dowager Cixi in the period of Boxer Movement. Journal of Historical Science.

Zhang, Z. (2010). Cixi and modernization of China. Asian Social Science, 6, 154.