The Hope Tax in Mark Six: Behavioral Economics Behind Lotteries

According to the Hong Kong Jockey Club's annual report, the total betting amount on the lottery for the 2023-24 fiscal year reached an astonishing HKD 8.5 billion. This translates to an average daily expenditure of HKD 23.28 million by Hong Kong residents—all spent on what many refer to as "hope." These figures not only highlight the popularity of the game but also raise questions about what drives people to invest so heavily in the slim chance of a life-changing payout.

This raises an intriguing question: Is the Mark Six simply a harmless form of entertainment, a kind of financial investment for the masses? Or is it better understood as "a tax on the poor"—a term often used to describe lotteries because of their disproportionate appeal to lower-income individuals? For many, the lottery represents a rare opportunity to dream of escaping financial hardship, even if the odds are overwhelmingly stacked against them.

This paradox between hope and delusion lies at the heart of the behavioral economics underpinning lotteries like the Mark Six. Why do people consistently choose to spend money on what is, mathematically, a losing proposition? What psychological forces drive individuals to see the lottery not as a gamble, but as a pathway to a better life?

PDF Version

Mark Six & Expected Value

The Mark Six lottery is one of Hong Kong’s most popular forms of gambling, operated by the Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC). Launched in 1975, it has since become a cultural staple, enticing millions of residents with the promise of transforming their lives overnight. The game’s simple format and potential for enormous payouts have made it a household name and a symbol of hope for many.

The game works on a straightforward principle: players select six numbers from a pool of 49. During each draw, six main numbers and one additional "bonus number" are randomly selected. To win the jackpot, a player must match all six main numbers. While the odds of this happening are exceptionally low—approximately 1 in 13.98 million—the allure of a life-changing windfall keeps people coming back. In addition to the jackpot, there are several smaller prize tiers for players who match fewer numbers, making it accessible to a wide range of participants.

Over the decades, the Mark Six has grown into more than just a game. It has become a source of excitement and anticipation, with televised draws and public announcements creating a shared sense of community. Moreover, a portion of the proceeds is directed toward charitable causes and public welfare programs, which the HKJC promotes as a way for participants to "give back" while trying their luck.

One of the most striking ways to analyze the Mark Six lottery is through the lens of expected value (EV), which highlights a fundamental paradox in gambling behavior. The probability of winning the jackpot in the Mark Six is approximately 1 in 13,983,816, an astronomically low chance. To put this into perspective, the likelihood of being struck by lightning in a given year is less than one in a million, significantly higher than winning the jackpot.

To evaluate the financial rationality of playing Mark Six, we can calculate the expected value of a single ticket costing HKD 10, assuming the jackpot prize is HKD 100 million. The expected value formula is as follows: Expected Value = (Jackpot Prize × Probability of Winning) - Ticket Cost. For this example:

Expected Value = (100,000,000 × 1/13,983,816) - 10

Expected Value ≈ HKD 7.15 - 10 = -HKD 2.85

This means that, on average, a player loses HKD 2.85 for every HKD 10 ticket purchased. In fact, for a ticket’s expected value to break even (i.e., to become positive), the jackpot would need to reach at least HKD 140 million, which rarely happens. Despite these unfavorable odds, millions of people continue to buy tickets, driven by psychological factors that go beyond pure mathematical logic.

Behavioral Economics Perspective

From the perspective of behavioral economics, the persistence of lottery participation can be explained by psychological mechanisms such as loss aversion and probability distortion, as outlined in prospect theory.

Probability Distortion

Humans are notoriously bad at understanding probabilities, especially when dealing with extreme odds. In the case of the Mark Six, the minuscule chance of winning (1 in 13.98 million) feels subjectively much larger than it actually is. This is why many players perceive the lottery as a viable or even realistic way to achieve financial security, even though the odds are overwhelmingly against them.

Loss Aversion

People tend to give disproportionate weight to potential losses compared to equivalent gains. However, in the context of the lottery, the small financial loss of purchasing a ticket (HKD 10) feels negligible compared to the massive potential gain of winning the jackpot. This imbalance between the perceived loss and the dream of a life-changing reward skews decision-making in favor of participation.

The "Near-Term Effect"

Another behavioral phenomenon that drives lottery participation is the near-term effect, where people’s decisions are influenced by recent outcomes. For example, when multiple consecutive draws pass without a jackpot winner, the prize pool rolls over and grows larger. This creates a media buzz and amplifies public anticipation. As a result, sales for the next draw can surge by as much as 200%, as seen in past cases.

The psychological mechanism behind this behavior is simple: a larger jackpot feels more tangible and attainable, even though the odds of winning remain unchanged. This illusion of a "better opportunity" motivates people to buy more tickets, further demonstrating how irrational optimism often overrides rational financial reasoning in lottery participation.

By combining microeconomic analysis with behavioral insights, we can better understand why the Mark Six lottery continues to thrive despite its unfavorable odds—offering not just a chance at wealth but also the emotional allure of "hope."

Macroeconomic Observations

Lotteries, including the Mark Six, exhibit a counter-cyclical nature, meaning they tend to thrive during periods of economic downturn. This phenomenon can be explained using concepts from game theory, where players’ perceptions of risk and reward become the primary motivators for their decisions. When individuals experience financial stress, they are more likely to engage in riskier behaviors, such as purchasing lottery tickets, in the hope of finding a way out of their economic struggles.

Research by Shawzub Raza sheds light on this trend, revealing that lottery participation tends to surge during economic crises, particularly among lower socioeconomic groups. This behavior is driven by the idea that the lottery offers a slim but enticing hope for a better financial future in times of uncertainty. For many, it represents one of the few accessible ways to potentially escape poverty or debt, even if the odds are heavily stacked against them.

However, Raza’s study primarily focuses on the experiences of lottery winners, painting an incomplete picture of the broader reality. In truth, the overwhelming majority of participants lose, as the likelihood of winning a jackpot—whether it is the Powerball in the U.S. or the Mark Six in Hong Kong—is practically 100% against them. Despite this, the emotional appeal of "what if" continues to lure players, especially during periods of economic hardship, when the promise of a life-changing payout feels more urgent than ever.

Counter-Cyclical Nature of Lotteries

The Lottery as an Economic Indicator

Interestingly, the counter-cyclical nature of lotteries also positions them as a potential economic indicator. When economic conditions worsen, lottery sales often increase, reflecting heightened financial insecurity among the population. This trend is particularly pronounced in lower-income communities, where individuals may perceive fewer opportunities for upward mobility and rely more heavily on the lottery as a form of escapism.

At the macroeconomic level, the resilience of lottery revenues during recessions provides governments and operators with a stable source of funding, often directed toward public programs or charitable initiatives. However, this raises ethical concerns about whether lotteries exploit vulnerable populations by capitalizing on their financial desperation.

The counter-cyclical surge in lottery participation highlights the dual role of lotteries during economic crises: they serve as a beacon of hope for individuals, while simultaneously reflecting deeper systemic issues of inequality and financial instability. As such, analyzing lottery behavior during economic downturns not only offers insights into human psychology but also provides a window into the broader socioeconomic dynamics at play.

Conclusion: The Economics of Hope

The Mark Six lottery, operated by the Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC), has long been recognized as a socially responsible system. A significant portion of its proceeds is directed toward public welfare, charitable programs, and community development. The HKJC has built a reputation for fulfilling its corporate social responsibility by channeling funds into education, healthcare, sports, and other initiatives that benefit society as a whole. This distinguishes the Mark Six from private gambling enterprises, as its operations are structured to serve public interests rather than solely generating profit.

However, the broader question remains: How can lotteries like the Mark Six continue to balance their roles as a source of entertainment and a mechanism for funding public goods, without fostering irresponsible gambling behaviors?

To navigate this challenge effectively, a combination of behavioral economics principles, regulatory oversight, and public education is essential. Promoting responsible gambling is a critical first step. Tools such as spending limits, self-exclusion programs, and reminders about the odds of winning can help mitigate excessive gambling behaviors. These interventions leverage behavioral nudges to encourage rational decision-making. Additionally, clear communication about the low probability of winning can combat cognitive biases, such as the "illusion of control," which leads individuals to overestimate their chances of success. Offering accessible support systems, such as counseling and helplines, further ensures at-risk individuals have avenues to seek help.

Maintaining public trust is equally important for state-sponsored lotteries. Allocating lottery proceeds transparently to social initiatives like education, healthcare, and infrastructure reinforces the perception of the lottery as a mechanism for public benefit rather than exploitation. Regular third-party audits and public disclosures about the use of lottery revenues can strengthen this trust and demonstrate accountability. By showcasing the tangible outcomes of lottery funds, operators can highlight their commitment to serving the community while distancing themselves from the profit-driven nature of private gambling enterprises.

To ensure the lottery remains a form of entertainment rather than a financial pitfall, it is essential to focus on its recreational aspects. Marketing efforts should highlight the fun and excitement of participating, rather than framing it as a wealth-building opportunity. Limiting the frequency of draws can also help reduce the risk of compulsive participation while maintaining public interest. For instance, spacing out lottery draws instead of offering them daily can encourage mindful and occasional participation.

Finally, public education campaigns are a cornerstone of responsible lottery management. Educating players about the randomness of lottery outcomes and the risks of gambling is crucial to promoting informed participation. These campaigns can normalize the idea that playing the lottery should always be within one's financial means. Partnering with schools and community organizations to teach financial literacy and the psychology of gambling to younger generations can help build long-term resilience against gambling addiction.

In conclusion, the Mark Six lottery can be designed to serve society's broader interests. By channeling proceeds into public goods and maintaining a strong focus on corporate social responsibility, it distinguishes itself from private enterprises. However, the ethical challenges of preventing gambling addiction and financial harm must remain a priority. By leveraging behavioral economics, emphasizing transparency, and educating the public, Jockey Club can balance the "economics of hope" with their duty to protect vulnerable populations. This approach ensures that lotteries remain a form of entertainment and a force for societal good, rather than a source of financial harm.