The U.S.–China Tariff War: Which Industries Are Feeling the Heat the Most?

PDF Version

When Washington and Beijing began trading tariff salvos in 2018, the spotlight naturally fell on steel, soybeans and smartphones. Yet beneath those headline sectors sit two service industries that power global commerce every single day and that now find themselves squarely in the line of fire: localization (translation) and logistics. Both depend on predictable cross-border expansion strategies. Both assumed that the world was moving inexorably toward deeper economic integration. And both have discovered—often painfully—that tariffs can upend their business models just as dramatically as they do a farmer’s or a factory’s.

Localisation & Translation Industry

For most of the past decade, language-service providers (LSPs) rode a wave of Western multinationals pouring into China. Once a U.S. brand decided to enter the mainland market, translation budgets immediately ballooned. Mobile apps needed Mandarin strings, user manuals required careful legal vetting, chat-bots had to sound like native customer-service agents and marketing teams scrambled to tailor slogans for WeChat campaigns. Annual revenue growth of four to five percent in Asia was common, and LSPs staffed micro-teams of gaming linguists, fintech terminologists or medical-device editors to keep pace.

Tariffs changed the trajectory almost overnight. During the first rounds of duties in 2018 and 2019, language firms actually saw a brief spike in rush projects as clients updated customs documentation, product labels and compliance notices. But once executives began canceling or delaying China roll-outs, the pipeline of creative localisation work dried up. In 2021 and 2022 volumes flattened; by 2025, after the United States imposed a baseline levy of 145 percent on Chinese imports and Beijing retaliated with 125 percent duties, many mid-tier accounts were simply abandoned. The shock has forced LSPs to rethink everything from staffing to pricing. Freelance pools have grown as agencies shed full-time project managers. Investment capital is being redirected toward Southeast Asian languages—Vietnamese, Thai, Bahasa—because that is where new plants are opening.

Logistics Industry & Others

Container lines, freight forwarders and port operators felt the tremors just as quickly. Before the first tariff volley, the China–U.S. corridor made up nearly one-fifth of global container traffic. Routes were ritualized: a vessel left Ningbo, stopped in Shanghai, crossed the Pacific and unloaded at Los Angeles or Long Beach like clockwork. Tariffs shattered that rhythm. Importers front-loaded shipments to beat implementation deadlines, producing record traffic one month and empty berths the next. As duties ratcheted higher, buyers shifted purchase orders to Vietnam, Malaysia, India or, closer to the United States, Mexico. Forwarders had to master unfamiliar customs codes and juggle multi-leg itineraries that stitched together new manufacturing clusters with existing distribution centers.

Consumer-electronics brands, semiconductor-equipment vendors and automotive giants have each confronted their own tariff shocks, but the mechanism is similar. Higher duties raise the bill of materials, force assembly to cheaper jurisdictions, trigger fresh waves of localisation, and send freight planners scrambling for alternative routings. Agriculture, long a U.S. export powerhouse to China, has seen entire commodity flows rerouted toward Latin America and the European Union, creating knock-on effects for grain elevators, railroads and shipping lines at home.

Outlook: Permanent Disruption or Temporary Detour?

Neither localisation nor logistics will vanish, but both must evolve. Language providers expect China-specific revenue to shrink further, yet they see new demand in the very act of decoupling—every relocation deal, every compliance audit and every cross-license still needs meticulous translation. Freight operators are betting on geographic agility: ports on America’s Gulf Coast are courting new all-water services from South-East Asia, while asset-light fourth-party logistics platforms sell themselves as tariff-proof switchboards that can reroute cargo at the click of a mouse.

One lesson is already clear. Geopolitics has become a core business variable, not a distant headline. For industries that once thrived on the assumption of frictionless borders, the tariff war has forced a painful but necessary reckoning.